Urology Times Newsletter

MALPRACTICE CONSULT

Man sues over outcomes from microwave device

"The urologist contended that, at all times, he was willing to undergo any training program that the manufacturer or distributor recommended and that he used the microwave device at all times exactly as instructed by the proctor and by the literature given to him," writes Acacia Brush Perko, Esq.

Read her column

Lack of emergent VCUG leads to costly settlement

"Following an adverse liability verdict, this defendant urologist did not also want the jury deciding damages," Perko writes.

Learn more

Inside a med-mal case: My brief stint as juror 22

"Based on their lines of questioning, it was apparent the defendant’s attorney wanted me to sit on the jury and the plaintiff’s attorney did not," writes Urology Times Content Channel Director Richard R. Kerr.

Read his editorial

SURVEY

Is DRE still a relevant tool in the management of prostate cancer?

Real-world data on the prostate cancer “revolution”

This Partner Perspective examines and reviews key insights from the PROCEED registry, a multicenter, open-label, observational registry of nearly 2,000 men with mCRPC.

Read now.